<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Jdk on Angus Thinks</title>
		<link>https://www.malcolmhardie.com/weblogs/angus/tags/jdk/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Jdk on Angus Thinks</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
		
		
			<copyright>@2026 Angus Hardie</copyright>
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.malcolmhardie.com/weblogs/angus/tags/jdk/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Mac OS X will still have Java in the future.</title>
				<link>https://www.malcolmhardie.com/weblogs/angus/posts/2010/10/26/mac-os-x-will-still-have-java-in-the-future/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.malcolmhardie.com/weblogs/angus/posts/2010/10/26/mac-os-x-will-still-have-java-in-the-future/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;There has been lots of stuff written recently about how Java on the Mac has been deprecated.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reality is that one particular Java runtime has been deprecated: the one that Apple write themselves. Java as a language will still be available, only it won&amp;rsquo;t be Apple that writes it and possibly it might be an optional download.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The confusion is because up until now there has really been only one Java runtime on the Mac, which Apple wrote themselves using code licensed from Sun. Now Apple has chosen to discontinue their own particular runtime, but this doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean that there won&amp;rsquo;t be any Java at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
